EEEI publishes Good Practices Guide on Civil Judicial Expertise PDF Print E-mail
This guide is the result of several years’ work led by the European Expertise and Expert Institute (EEEI) with the support of the European Commission’s DG Justice.

This guide is the result of several years’ work led by the European Expertise and Expert Institute (EEEI) with the support of the European Commission’s DG Justice. It was created by a consensus conference based on the cooperation and comparative experience of a panel of 60 contributors from 12 EU countries who came together in working groups, meeting over 25 times in the past year. Their discussions and recommendations were put to the test during a public plenary conference that took place in May 2015 in Rome and was attended by 160 people from 22 countries – Judges, lawyers, experts, and academics, representatives from Supreme Courts and European institutions. 

The Guide contains best practice recommendations on Expert proceedings, on certification, on ethics and status, and on the creation of a European list of Experts. Part of these recommendations can already be applied by Experts, in particular : the declaration of independence at the beginning of each expert evaluation, the purchase of insurance, the practice of drafting a pre-report, and the writing of a structured report.

Link to EEEI website

Link to the Guide (EN)

Link to the Guide (FR)

 
ENCJ regional Timeliness seminar Bucharest PDF Print E-mail

On 9-10 November 2015 ENCJ organised a regional Timeliness seminar in Bucharest for the Central and South Eastern countries. The seminar was the 3rd in a series of 4 seminars. Participants came from the Judicial Councils and authorities of Albania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Montenegro, Romaina, Slovenia and Slovakia. The CEPEJ and the European Commission also attended and addressed the participants. The meeting was chaired by ENCJ coordinator Mr Niels Grubbe of Denmark and hosted by the Romanian CSM.

encj_timeliness_seminar_2015The aim of the seminar was to increase awareness for the issue of Timeliness, to deepen the understanding of causes and remedies, and to discuss the recommendations and the cooperation between stakeholders, and thus to further the implementation of the recommendations. It was deemed appropriate to organise the seminars with participants from countries within a region with comparable culture and legal traditions.

 

 
ENCJ President meets EU Commissioner for Justice PDF Print E-mail
vos_jourova_sept_2015On 22nd September Mr Geoffrey Vos met with Mrs Jourova, the Commissioner for Justice Consumers and Gender Equality.
The President reported on his meeting with the Commissioner, Mrs Jourova which took place on 22 September. One of the issues discussed was the quality of justice. Mrs Jourova agreed that this issue has a significant cultural content that needs to be carefully considered. The Commissioner indicated that she is keen that the ENCJ should continue its cooperation with the EC on the Scoreboard as it moves to consider the quality of justice.  She is concerned that the EC should re-think the methodology of the Scoreboard.  The President offered ENCJ’s assistance. The commissioner would like to develop indicators of quality. Again, the President indicated that the ENCJ was willing to help, and indeed that was a large part of the ENCJ’s continuation of the independence project in 2015/16.
There was a discussion about the objective and subjective independence of the judiciary.  The EC has received criticism because the only subjective views in the Scoreboard had come from business (Figure 47 World Economic Forum).  The ENCJ would be happy to assist the EC on the preparation of a new Eurobarometer evaluating consumer confidence in the justice systems of Europe and the independence of those judiciaries.
Towards the end of the meeting, the issue of funding was discussed.  Mrs Jourova thinks that the EC’s budget should be directed towards its priorities, and should not be determined in isolation from the determination of those priorities.  One of those priorities was to provide a programme for the improvement of the quality of justice across the EU involving training, ethics, and enhancing respect for the judiciary.  The ENCJ President suggested that this might bring in the ENCJ’s cooperation with EJTN in relation to training judges across Europe in good practices concerning judicial governance, Councils for the Judiciary, and best practice generally.
The Commissioner asked what she should say when she would visit Ukraine (23/25 September). The President thought that she should make it clear that there was a need for the Councils to be functionally independent so as to be able to combat the problems of judicial corruption.  The ENCJ would be pleased to engage with the Ukrainian Councils.  The Commissioner also mentioned that she though that as a follow-up to the EU project in Ukraine European internships could be offered to young judges and prosecutors.
A final idea which was raised by the ENCJ was that there might be a brainstorming session between the networks, organised by the EC, to discuss how to improve the quality of justice.  The bodies to be involved (not more than 10 people) might include ENCJ, EJTN, ASCP (Supreme Court Presidents), and ACA. The Commissioner thought this was a good idea and suggested as a title “How can the Scoreboard measure (perhaps “and improve”) the quality of justice?”
The meeting concluded with a discussion on the EPPO (European Public Prosecutors Office) and the question of countries that allow “transactions” to buy out the prosecution for a criminal offence. Mrs Jourova is concerned that prosecutors do not understand that the project is not intended to interfere with national prosecution procedures or practices, but is intended to produce another layer to investigate and prosecute EU-fraud and other crimes affecting the Union's financial interests, which is hard to tackle at a national level.

One of the issues that was discussed was the continuation of the cooperation between ENCJ and the Commission on the EU Justice Scoreboard as it moves to consider the quality of justice.  Another point of discussion was the need for  a programme for the improvement of the quality of justice across the EU involving training, ethics, and enhancing respect for the judiciary.  The ENCJ President suggested that this might bring in the ENCJ’s cooperation with EJTN in relation to training judges across Europe in good practices concerning judicial governance, Councils for the Judiciary, and best practice generally.  

The meeting concluded with a discussion on the EPPO (European Public Prosecutors Office) and the way forward in relation to the investigation and prosecution of EU-fraud and other crimes affecting the Union's financial interests.  

Picture courtesy of the European Union - © European Union, 2015

 
Call for proposals for training of national competition law judges PDF Print E-mail
We would like to announce to you the recent publication of our new Call for Proposals 2015 on "TRAINING OF NATIONAL JUDGES IN EU COMPETITION LAW AND JUDICIAL COOPERATION BETWEEN NATIONAL COMPETITION LAW JUDGES". The Call is published in English first and will be followed by all the other EU official languages, on our website http://ec.europa.eu/competition/calls/proposals_open.html
The EU Commission will finance up to 80%-90%* of successful projects submitted under this Call.
Projects should consists in trainings (initial, compulsory or advanced) or events on EU competition law targeting judges, prosecutors, apprentice national judges and the legal staff of the judges’ offices or of national courts.

The European Commission has published a new Call for Proposals 2015 on "Training of national judges in EU Competition Law and Judicial Cooperation between National Competetion Law Judges". The Call is published in the website of DG Justice.  Projects should consist of training (initial, compulsory or advanced) or events on EU competition law targeting judges, prosecutors, trainee-judges and the legal staff of the judges’ offices or of national courts.

 
European Commission opens a new call for proposals for funding of judicial training projects PDF Print E-mail
European Commission invites applications for judicial training projects and allocates 5.5 million €
The European Commission has increased financial support for judicial training projects by 500.000 €.
Eligible are only cross-border projects on training judges, prosecutors, lawyers, notaries, court staff, bailiffs and mediators on civil/commercial law, criminal law, law with fundamental rights implications, prevention of radicalisation, law of other Member States or legal foreign language, as specified in the call.

The European Commission invites applications for judicial training projects. Eligible are only cross-border projects on training judges, prosecutors, lawyers, notaries, court staff, bailiffs and mediators on civil/commercial law, criminal law, law with fundamental rights implications, prevention of radicalisation, law of other Member States or legal foreign language, as specified in the call. The funding priorities fixed by the European Commission include in particular the prosecution of suspects of terrorism and organized crime as well as the prevention of radicalization in detention, including the use of alternatives to imprisonment. 

Go to Call for Proposals on DG Justice page

 


Page 5 of 17
ENCJ News
05/04/2016 > CCJE and the CCPE publish report on the challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States
article thumbnail

Report from the CCJE and the CCPE on the main challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States The Bureaus of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE [ ... ]


New on the website

ENCJ Executive Board´s opinion on the drafts law of Poland

On 30th January 2017 the ENCJ Executive Board adopted an opinion upon the request of the Polish Krajowa Rada Sadownictwa. The opinion deals with the draft laws that the Minister of Justice of Poland sent to the KRS for their views and sets out...

ENCJ votes to suspend the Turkish High Council for Judges and Prosecutors

The ENCJ unites the national institutions in the Member States of the European Union which are independent of the executive and legislature, and which are responsible for the support of the Judiciaries in the independent delivery of...

Former ENCJ President Geoffrey Vos, appointed Chancellor of the High Court

The Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Vos, ENCJ President from 2015 till June 2016, has been appointed as the Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales, with effect from 24 October 2016.  The Chancellor of the High Court is the president of the...

CEPEJ publishes 2016 report on the functioning of the judicial systems in Europe

With a report and a new interactive database, the CEPEJ-STAT, both of which are available to the public, the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of Europe publishes today it findings as regards the main...

Statement on the position of the Turkish High Council for Judges and Prosecutors in the ENCJ

The ENCJ reiterates its unreserved condemnation of the recent attempted coup in Turkey. The loss of life incurred in this attack on a democratically elected government is inexcusable. Those responsible should be made accountable through an...

Brainstorm session with European Commissioner Jourova

On 19th September 2016 the ENCJ participated in an informal brainstorm session which was organised and hosted by the European Commission. The session aimed to discuss the Quality and Independence of the Justice Systems. Besides the European...

Extraordinary Congress of Polish Judges

On Saturday 3rd September 2016 over 1000 Polish judges gathered in Warsaw to discuss the ongoing tension between Poland's government and Constitutional Tribunal. In addition the congress discussed a new prosecution act and the influence of...

ENCJ´s statement on developments in Turkey

The ENCJ condemns the attempted coup in Turkey and regrets the loss of lives and many casualties. Those behind the coup should be held responsible through a fair and impartial trial in accordance with international standards. The ENCJ is...
Relevant EU News
EC DG Justice

 

 

| Contact by post mail // phone | Link section | Website creation and hosting by Pragmawork | All right reserved 2010 |