Council of Europe launches action plan on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality PDF Print E-mail
Justice ministers from across Europe have given their backing to the Council of Europe’s new 2016-2021 action plan on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality. At a conference held in Sofia, justice ministers from the Council of Europe’s 47 member states and representatives of the judiciary agreed to take the necessary steps to implement the plan.
Geoffrey Vos addressed the conference on the topic of protecting the independence of individual judges and ensuring their impartiality. In his speech he presented some of the outcomes of the project on Independence and Accountability in which the ENCJ has identified the indicators and the challenges to each of independence and accountability. He stressed that the executive in all countries needs to have a clear understanding of what judicial independence and accountability entail. In return, judges, need to realise that the concept of judicial independence is not an absolute one.  They are responsible for the effective delivery of justice, and that is a great responsibility.  To achieve it, they must work with their governments to provide what is imperative in every democratic state – a fair and impartial decision making process, in which citizens from all parts of society and the state itself has absolute confidence.

Justice ministers from across Europe have given their backing to the Council of Europe’s new 2016-2021 action plan on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality. At a conference held in Sofia, justice ministers and representatives of the judiciary agreed to take the necessary steps to implement the plan.

Geoffrey Vos addressed the conference on the topic of protecting the independence of individual judges and ensuring their impartiality. In his speech he highlighted some of the outcomes of the project on Independence and Accountability in which the ENCJ has identified the indicators and the challenges to independence and accountability. He stressed that the executive in all countries needs to have a clear understanding of what judicial independence and accountability entail. In return, judges, need to realise that the concept of judicial independence is not an absolute one.  They are responsible for the effective delivery of justice, and that is a great responsibility.  To achieve it, they must work with their governments to provide what is imperative in every democratic state – a fair and impartial decision making process, in which citizens from all parts of society and the state itself has absolute confidence.

 
2016 EU Justice Scoreboard PDF Print E-mail
On 11 April 2016 the European Commission presented the 2016 EU Justice Scoreboard. Like in previous years the ENCJ collaborated with the Commission on some parts of the Scoreboard. In addition to the scoreboard two Flash Eurobarometers were published. Number 435 deals with perceived independence of national courts in the EU Member States by the general public. Number 436 deals with the perception of judicial independence by companies.
 
CCJE and the CCPE publish report on the challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States PDF Print E-mail
Report from the CCJE and the CCPE on the main challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States
The Bureaus of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) and the Consultative Council of European Prosecutors (CCPE) have jointly submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe a report on the “Challenges for judicial independence and impartiality in the member states of the Council of Europe”. This report follows the Secretary General’s 2015 report: ”State of Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Europe – a shared responsibility for democratic security in Europe“, where the CCJE and CCPE were requested to “urgently draft a comprehensive review of the main challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in member states”. This report is published together with a document compiling the comments on this report, forwarded to the Secretariat by the member states of the Council of Europe.

On the request of the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe, the Bureaus of the CCJE and CCPE have jointly prepared and submitted e a report on the “Challenges for judicial independence and impartiality in the member states of the Council of Europe”. The report follows the Secretary General’s 2015 report: ”State of Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Europe – a shared responsibility for democratic security in Europe“, in which the CCJE and CCPE were requested to “urgently draft a comprehensive review of the main challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in member states”. The report is published together with a document compiling the comments on this report, forwarded to the Secretariat by the member states of the Council of Europe.

The ENCJ has been involved in the preparation of the report and ENCJ´s reports, in particular the report on Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary have been used by the CCJE and CCPE for their report.  

 
EC launches public consultation on insolvency in the EU PDF Print E-mail

The Commission wants to help businesses overcome financial difficulties in case of bankruptcy, while at the same time maximising the value received by other parties concerned. An appropriate insolvency framework would be an essential element of a good business environment and would therefore in the Commission's view be important for jobs and growth. This consultation seeks stakeholders' views on key insolvency aspects. In particular, it seeks views with regard to common principles and standards which could ensure that national insolvency frameworks work well, especially in a cross-border context.

Contributions from courts are particularly welcomed by the Commission. The consultation is open till 14th June 2016. 

For more information click here

 
Dutch Council publishes working paper on Independence and Accountability PDF Print E-mail
We use the data to gain a deeper understanding of various ways
to approach judicial independence and the main determinants of independence by a statistical analysis
presented here. We try to answer three questions in particular. First, do perceptions of independence
differ between citizens and judges? Second, which are the important determinants of independence, as
perceived by judges in judicial practice? And third, what is the relationship, if any, between perceived
independence and formal safeguards of independence?

The Netherlands Council for the Judiciary has conducted a further study of the results of the ENCJ Independence and Accountability report 2014-2015.

The working paper Independence and Accountability: Judicial Perceptions and Formal Safeguards uses the data gathered by ENCJ to gain a deeper understanding of various ways to approach judicial independence and the main determinants of independence through a statistical analysis. The paper sets out to answer three questions in particular. First, do perceptions of independencediffer between citizens and judges? Second, which are the important determinants of independence, as perceived by judges in judicial practice? And third, what is the relationship, if any, between perceived independence and formal safeguards of independence?

 


Page 2 of 15
ENCJ News
05/04/2016 > CCJE and the CCPE publish report on the challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States
article thumbnail

Report from the CCJE and the CCPE on the main challenges for judicial impartiality and independence in Council of Europe member States The Bureaus of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE [ ... ]


New on the website

2015/2016 ENCJ reports presented and adopted

At the ENCJ General Assembly in Warsaw on 1st to 3rd June 2016 the ENCJ adopted the following reports: ENCJ report on Independence and Accountability - Improving the performance indicators and Quality of Justice ENCJ report on Standards VI:...

Standards on Non-judicial Members in Judicial Governance

The ENCJ considered in addition that there is a need for the establishment of Minimum Judicial Standards in relation to the involvement of non-judicial members in Judicial Governance. Project VI was established to consider this issue,...

ENCJ adopts Warsaw declaration

At its General Assemby which took place from 1st to 3rd June in Warsaw the ENCJ adopted the Warsaw declaration on the Future of Justice in Europe.  In the declaration the ENCJ amongst others recognises that the administration of...

ENCJ elects new President and Board members

On the 1st of June 2016 the ENCJ Members gathered in Warsaw to elect a new President and 4 new Board members. Ms. Nuria Diaz Abad, member of the Spanish Consejo General del Poder Judicial, was elected to succeed Sir Geoffrey Vos as President...

ENCJ welcomes new Members

The ENCJ General Assembly which meets in Warsaw from 1-3 June in Warsaw welcomed two new Members on Wednesday 1st June. The Greek Supreme Judicial Council of the Civil and Penal Justice and the Greek Supreme Judicial Council of the...

CJEU launches app

The Court of Justice of the European Union launched its application, CVRIA, for smartphones and tablets, which runs under both IOS and Android. The application is available in 23 EU languages which can be selected in the menu by the user. It...

Council of Europe launches action plan on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality

Justice ministers from across Europe have given their backing to the Council of Europe’s new 2016-2021 action plan on strengthening judicial independence and impartiality. At a conference held in Sofia, justice ministers from the Council of...

2016 EU Justice Scoreboard

On 11 April 2016 the European Commission presented the 2016 EU Justice Scoreboard. Like in previous years the ENCJ collaborated with the Commission on some parts of the Scoreboard. In addition to the scoreboard two Flash Eurobarometers were...
Relevant EU News

 

 

| Contact by post mail // phone | Link section | Website creation and hosting by Pragmawork | All right reserved 2010 |